Same people can't survive, no standard's even set, yet they ask us to discuss it.
No, the standard was decided by their vote.
Right.
Exactly, if there was a standard,
you'd think if there was a standard, it'd be boring,
then this thing would have a standard.
So what would they base it on,
on what idea would they judge?
You mean 12 people?
Yes.
Not sure, everyone disagrees, haven't you been part of it?
Yes, but before we were clear,
that it's for the group's benefit?
But no, in the second round,
it was all about one strong person controlling it,
that guy, the fat one, almost almost...
No, no different match, no different match.
He really pushed his leader traits to the max,
and some even thought following him,
was just a step away, but then the emergency draft won that match.
It's not about buying a trait,
it's about a person being able to push that trait to the max.
This round doesn't set any questions?
You can set them?
Oh, you mean that? No, no.
Oh, you can set them?
I didn't, I didn't.
Because that match was the only fictional one,
no, the only two fictional scenarios,
with very clear stages,
but the effect wasn't great,
so I was,
What I did when I first got on stage,
All of it was me asking,
I did a lot of research,
Did research for several shows,
Everyone,
About your personal background,
Background stuff,
Background stuff, background stuff,
Then about professional information,
And some gaps in what you said,
Like that boy studied psychology,
Psychology,
But he wanted,
He was studying psychology in Beijing,
He wanted to recover from,
Then...
He thought psychology had some issues,
so he wanted to quit,
but in this scene,
he says one of the skills that keeps him alive,
is psychology,
so I'm really confused,
I mean,
you wanted to give up on psychology,
you wanted to quit,
now that the population's decreased,
you say you'll pick up psychology,
as your weapon to survive,
so is this,
can anyone believe you after that,
will you even use psychology later,
maybe you'll survive,
You're hurt,
Not just hurting others,
How can we trust you?
For example,
things like this,
all during our communication with him,
on the phone,
we found out,
so we can confront him,
things like this,
for example,
Ah,
it's Shen Yu Zuo,
feels so big,
Yeah,
Do you think people can be contradictory?
Of course contradictory,
What I mean is,
You might do some research upfront,
like,
no matter who you're researching,
you think,
this should be the kind of person,
but what they show might,
be completely different,
but they don't have specific issues,
after giving the decision-making power away,
it's in the trial,
we broadcasters,
need to make their decision,
more,
more traditional significance,
Aren't you a lawyer?
Don't you ask questions?
Right,
But this,
is,
equivalent to having no scope,
no domain,
Right,
Call him on the phone,
And,
just like that day,
it's the rule,
Good, should be huge